cheatsheet_lesson1

Information Credibility: Separating Facts from Fiction Online - Cheat Sheet

The ESCAPE Method for Evaluating Sources

  • Evidence: Are claims backed by verifiable data?
  • Source: Who created this information and why?
  • Context: Is the full context presented or just partial information?
  • Audience: Who is the intended audience? How might this affect presentation?
  • Purpose: Why was this content created? (Inform, persuade, entertain, sell)
  • Execution: How is the information presented? Professional or sloppy?

Red Flags of Misinformation

  • Emotional, sensationalist language
  • Clickbait headlines that don’t match content
  • Missing or anonymous authors
  • No citations or links to sources
  • Outdated information presented as current
  • Claims of “suppressed” or “secret” information
  • Excessive ads, popups, or revenue-generating features
  • Mimicking legitimate news sites with slight URL differences

Quick Fact-Checking Techniques

  • Search the claim + “fact check”
  • Check multiple reputable sources
  • Verify images with reverse image search
  • Look for original context of quotes
  • Check publication dates for timeliness
  • Examine author credentials and expertise
  • Look for expert consensus on scientific topics
  • Visit fact-checking websites (Snopes, FactCheck.org, etc.)

Types of Misleading Content

  • Misinformation: False information shared without intent to harm
  • Disinformation: Deliberately false information created to deceive
  • Malinformation: True information shared out of context to cause harm
  • Clickbait: Sensationalist content designed to generate clicks
  • Pseudoscience: Claims that appear scientific but lack evidence
  • Deepfakes: Manipulated media that appears authentic

Cognitive Biases That Affect Evaluation

  • Confirmation bias: Favoring information that confirms existing beliefs
  • Availability bias: Giving more weight to easily recalled examples
  • Bandwagon effect: Believing something because many others do
  • Authority bias: Trusting information from perceived authorities
  • Emotional reasoning: Evaluating based on emotional response

Lateral Reading Process

  1. Leave the original site to investigate the source
  2. Open new tabs to search for information about the publisher/author
  3. Look for what others say about the source
  4. Return to original content with context about its reliability

Before You Share

  • Read beyond the headline
  • Check the source’s reputation
  • Verify claims with trusted sources
  • Consider if it seems too good/bad to be true
  • Look for emotional manipulation
  • Check date for relevance
  • Consider your own biases
  • Ask: “How do I know this is true?”