Information Credibility: Separating Facts from Fiction Online - Cheat Sheet
The ESCAPE Method for Evaluating Sources
- Evidence: Are claims backed by verifiable data?
- Source: Who created this information and why?
- Context: Is the full context presented or just partial information?
- Audience: Who is the intended audience? How might this affect presentation?
- Purpose: Why was this content created? (Inform, persuade, entertain, sell)
- Execution: How is the information presented? Professional or sloppy?
Red Flags of Misinformation
- Emotional, sensationalist language
- Clickbait headlines that donât match content
- Missing or anonymous authors
- No citations or links to sources
- Outdated information presented as current
- Claims of âsuppressedâ or âsecretâ information
- Excessive ads, popups, or revenue-generating features
- Mimicking legitimate news sites with slight URL differences
Quick Fact-Checking Techniques
- Search the claim + âfact checkâ
- Check multiple reputable sources
- Verify images with reverse image search
- Look for original context of quotes
- Check publication dates for timeliness
- Examine author credentials and expertise
- Look for expert consensus on scientific topics
- Visit fact-checking websites (Snopes, FactCheck.org, etc.)
Types of Misleading Content
- Misinformation: False information shared without intent to harm
- Disinformation: Deliberately false information created to deceive
- Malinformation: True information shared out of context to cause harm
- Clickbait: Sensationalist content designed to generate clicks
- Pseudoscience: Claims that appear scientific but lack evidence
- Deepfakes: Manipulated media that appears authentic
Cognitive Biases That Affect Evaluation
- Confirmation bias: Favoring information that confirms existing beliefs
- Availability bias: Giving more weight to easily recalled examples
- Bandwagon effect: Believing something because many others do
- Authority bias: Trusting information from perceived authorities
- Emotional reasoning: Evaluating based on emotional response
Lateral Reading Process
- Leave the original site to investigate the source
- Open new tabs to search for information about the publisher/author
- Look for what others say about the source
- Return to original content with context about its reliability
Before You Share
- Read beyond the headline
- Check the sourceâs reputation
- Verify claims with trusted sources
- Consider if it seems too good/bad to be true
- Look for emotional manipulation
- Check date for relevance
- Consider your own biases
- Ask: âHow do I know this is true?â