Lesson 2: Learning Styles and Cognitive Preferences

Introduction

Have you ever noticed that some people seem to grasp concepts immediately when they see a diagram, while others prefer to hear an explanation? Or perhaps you’ve found yourself doodling during lectures, not out of boredom, but because it somehow helps you concentrate better?

These differences reflect our cognitive preferences—the ways we naturally tend to process, organize, and work with information. While the popular concept of rigid “learning styles” (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) has been largely debunked by research, there’s no denying that we all have different cognitive strengths, preferences, and approaches to learning.

In this lesson, we’ll explore how to identify your cognitive preferences and leverage them effectively, while also developing versatility in how you approach learning. Rather than pigeonholing yourself into a single “style,” you’ll discover how to adapt your learning strategies based on both your natural tendencies and the specific demands of what you’re trying to learn.

Objectives

By the end of this lesson, you’ll be able to: - Distinguish between learning styles myths and evidence-based cognitive preferences - Identify your own cognitive strengths and preferences - Adapt learning strategies to work with your natural tendencies - Develop versatility in your learning approaches - Select appropriate learning methods based on the subject matter - Create a personalized toolkit of learning strategies that leverage your strengths

The Learning Styles Myth: What Research Actually Shows

Let’s start by addressing the elephant in the room—the popular but largely unsupported notion of fixed learning styles:

The VAK/VARK Model and Its Limitations

You’ve likely heard of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic (VAK) learning styles, sometimes expanded to include Reading/Writing (VARK). This model suggests that: - Visual learners learn best through seeing (diagrams, videos) - Auditory learners learn best through hearing (lectures, discussions) - Reading/Writing learners learn best through text-based information - Kinesthetic learners learn best through physical activity and hands-on experiences

The theory proposes that instruction matching your preferred style leads to better learning outcomes. It’s an appealing idea that has been widely adopted in educational settings.

However, despite its popularity, extensive research has failed to support this “matching hypothesis.” While people do express preferences for how information is presented, studies consistently show that:

1. Most people learn better when information is presented in multiple modalities rather than just their “preferred” one
2. The most effective learning approach depends more on what you’re learning than on your personal style
3. Learners benefit from developing flexibility rather than doubling down on a single approach

Why the Myth Persists

The learning styles concept remains popular despite limited evidence because: - It feels intuitively correct based on our subjective experiences - It acknowledges the reality that people do learn differently - It’s been heavily commercialized through assessments and educational materials - It offers a simple explanation for learning difficulties that doesn’t blame the learner

A More Nuanced Approach: Cognitive Preferences

Rather than rigid “styles,” research supports the existence of cognitive preferences—tendencies in how we process information that can be leveraged but also expanded upon:

1. Preferences are real but flexible: We do have natural tendencies in how we process information, but these aren’t fixed or exclusive.
2. Multiple factors influence preferences: Our cognitive approaches are shaped by prior knowledge, cultural background, personality, and specific contexts—not just an innate “style.”
3. Versatility trumps specialization: The most successful learners adapt their approach based on the material rather than using the same strategies for everything.
4. Preferences ≠ abilities: Preferring one approach doesn’t mean you can’t learn effectively through other means.

Understanding Your Cognitive Profile

Instead of trying to identify a single learning style, let’s explore the multiple dimensions that make up your cognitive profile:

Information Processing Tendencies

Verbal vs. Visual Processing

• Verbal processors naturally translate information into words and internal dialogue
• Visual processors tend to think in images, diagrams, and spatial relationships

Most people use both approaches but may lean more heavily toward one. Neither is inherently better—they’re just different ways of handling information.

Sequential vs. Global Understanding

• Sequential processors prefer step-by-step, linear progression through material
• Global processors like to see the big picture first before diving into details

Again, these represent tendencies rather than absolute categories. You might approach different subjects with different strategies.

Environmental Preferences

Sensory Sensitivities

• Some learners are highly sensitive to environmental factors like noise, lighting, or temperature
• Others can focus effectively regardless of these external conditions

Social vs. Solitary Learning

• Some people think more clearly when discussing ideas with others
• Others process information better in solitude before sharing or discussing

Cognitive Rhythm and Energy

Time-of-Day Effects

• Your cognitive abilities fluctuate throughout the day based on your circadian rhythm
• Some people are mentally sharpest in the morning, others in the afternoon or evening

Continuous vs. Burst Processing

• Some learners work best in long, uninterrupted sessions
• Others thrive with shorter, more intense bursts of focus interspersed with breaks

Attention and Focus Patterns

Focused vs. Diffuse Thinking

• Focused mode involves concentrated attention on specific details
• Diffuse mode allows for broader, more creative connections between ideas

Both modes are valuable and complementary—effective learning requires shifting between them.

Depth vs. Breadth Orientation

• Some learners naturally dive deep into single topics
• Others prefer exploring connections across multiple areas

Assessing Your Cognitive Preferences

Let’s identify your own cognitive tendencies with some self-reflection exercises:

Quick Self-Assessment

For each pair of statements, indicate which one describes you more accurately most of the time:

1d5191342363817b9f3ec2241d61dae51d519134236381848ba9ee9d9e440227
1. I prefer written instructions
2. I prefer demonstrations or diagrams

1d519134236381c286f8d389ffeba6271d5191342363817b8d53c6a31bf8a54f
1. I like to understand the big picture before details
2. I prefer to learn step-by-step in a logical sequence

1d519134236381d7bd8eefe17665debb1d519134236381cf83a2e05cb0f9b93c
1. I think best when discussing ideas with others
2. I think best when processing information alone first

1d51913423638178b57ed8753348f72d1d51913423638136aa77fe8d54e7101b
1. I remember faces better than names
2. I remember names better than faces

1d519134236381c6b352c312bee57ff81d5191342363818a9e22f20d810fcfff
1. I prefer to focus deeply on one subject at a time
2. I enjoy switching between different topics

1d5191342363810e8a93ca405311c21d1d519134236381eb9094cede1dd49182
1. I learn best in quiet environments
2. I concentrate better with some background noise or music

1d519134236381e5a723c92581ba17761d519134236381c8a9a4fafabd1f4ddc
1. I’m most mentally alert in the morning
2. I’m most mentally alert in the afternoon or evening

1d5191342363817aaf58c836df0940ec1d519134236381d0bebee5136f71809f
1. I prefer to work in long, uninterrupted sessions
2. I prefer to work in shorter bursts with breaks

1d51913423638138bccdd887a589243d1d519134236381d192cbd7604546c83e
1. When learning something new, I like to practice repeatedly
2. When learning something new, I like to understand the theory first

1d5191342363815ab73df7d37b87088e1d519134236381e7ba00e04c759fbba6
1. I easily remember what I hear
2. I easily remember what I see

Your pattern of responses indicates tendencies, not rigid categories. The goal isn’t to label yourself but to recognize patterns that can inform your learning strategies.

Experiential Assessment

Beyond self-reporting, observe your actual learning behaviors:

1. Content Creation: When explaining something to others, do you naturally reach for a pen to draw a diagram, or do you craft a verbal explanation?
2. Note Review: When reviewing notes, do you remember where on the page information was written (visual-spatial), or what was said (verbal-linguistic)?
3. Problem-Solving: When tackling a complex problem, do you prefer to break it into sequential steps or grasp it holistically?
4. Learning History: Think about subjects you’ve learned easily versus those you’ve struggled with. Can you identify patterns in how these subjects were taught or structured?
5. Natural Habits: Notice what you do when trying to understand something difficult. Do you read aloud, create diagrams, move around, or use other specific strategies?

Leveraging Your Cognitive Strengths

Once you’ve identified your cognitive preferences, you can strategically leverage them:

For Verbal Processors

If you process information verbally:

1. Explain concepts aloud: Teaching or explaining material to others (or even to an imaginary audience) strengthens your understanding.
2. Use verbal mnemonics: Create acronyms, rhymes, or stories to remember information.
3. Record and listen: Record yourself summarizing key points and listen to the recordings during review.
4. Participate in discussions: Seek out study groups or discussion opportunities to verbalize your understanding.
5. Write summaries in your own words: Translating material into your own language reinforces comprehension.

For Visual Processors

If you process information visually:

1. Create mind maps and diagrams: Represent relationships between concepts visually.
2. Use color-coding: Organize information with consistent color systems.
3. Visualize processes: Create mental images of sequences or procedures.
4. Watch demonstrations: Seek out video tutorials when learning new skills.
5. Use spatial organization: Arrange notes or study materials in spatial layouts that reflect relationships.

For Sequential Processors

If you prefer sequential processing:

1. Create outlines and numbered lists: Organize information in clear, linear structures.
2. Break complex tasks into steps: Develop explicit procedures for multi-stage processes.
3. Use flowcharts: Map out decision points and processes visually but sequentially.
4. Seek logical explanations: Look for the underlying logic and causal relationships.
5. Create timelines: Organize historical or procedural information chronologically.

For Global Processors

If you prefer global processing:

1. Start with overviews: Read summaries or conclusions first to establish context.
2. Create concept maps: Show how all pieces relate to the whole.
3. Look for patterns and analogies: Connect new information to broader principles.
4. Use metaphors: Relate new concepts to familiar ideas that share structural similarities.
5. Ask “why” questions: Understand the purpose and context before details.

Developing Cognitive Versatility

While leveraging your strengths is important, developing versatility is equally valuable:

Expanding Your Cognitive Toolkit

1. Deliberately practice less preferred approaches: If you’re naturally verbal, challenge yourself to create visual representations; if you’re visual, practice verbal explanations.
2. Match strategies to content: Different subjects often benefit from different approaches—mathematics may require sequential processing while literature benefits from global understanding.
3. Combine approaches: Use both visual and verbal strategies together, or blend sequential and global approaches for more robust learning.
4. Experiment with new techniques: Try unfamiliar learning methods and objectively assess their effectiveness rather than just their comfort.
5. Adapt to the available instruction: Develop the ability to learn effectively regardless of how material is presented.

When to Push Beyond Preferences

Sometimes deliberately working against your preferences is beneficial:

1. When your preferred approach isn’t working: If you’re stuck, switching to a different cognitive approach can provide new insights.
2. When preparing for varied assessment methods: If you’ll be tested in multiple formats, practice with those formats regardless of your preferences.
3. When building professional versatility: Many careers require communicating with people who have different cognitive preferences.
4. When the subject demands it: Some content is inherently more suited to specific approaches regardless of your preferences.
5. To strengthen cognitive flexibility: Deliberately practicing non-preferred approaches builds overall cognitive adaptability.

Matching Strategies to Subject Matter

Different domains often benefit from specific approaches regardless of your personal preferences:

Mathematics and Logical Reasoning

Effective strategies often include: - Working through examples step-by-step - Visualizing problems with diagrams - Verbalizing your reasoning process - Alternating between focused problem-solving and diffuse reflection

Language Learning

Effective strategies often include: - Combining visual, auditory, and kinesthetic approaches - Using spaced repetition for vocabulary - Engaging in conversation practice - Creating context-based associations

Conceptual Understanding

For grasping theoretical concepts: - Creating analogies to familiar ideas - Discussing concepts with others - Applying ideas to real-world examples - Connecting new concepts to existing knowledge

Procedural Learning

For learning processes and procedures: - Breaking processes into clear steps - Practicing with gradual reduction of guidance - Teaching the procedure to someone else - Creating checklists or flowcharts

Factual Knowledge

For memorizing facts and information: - Using spaced retrieval practice - Creating meaningful associations - Organizing information into categories - Developing mnemonic devices

Creating Your Personalized Learning Approach

Rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all method, develop a personalized approach:

Your Strategic Learning Framework

1. Assess the learning task: What type of knowledge or skill are you trying to acquire? What are the inherent demands of the subject?
2. Consider your cognitive preferences: Which of your natural tendencies might help or hinder with this specific material?
3. Select primary strategies: Choose approaches that align with both the subject matter and your strengths.
4. Incorporate complementary methods: Add techniques that address the full spectrum of learning requirements, even if they’re not your preferred approaches.
5. Monitor and adjust: Pay attention to what’s working and be willing to shift strategies if you’re not making progress.

Creating Learning Strategy Cards

A practical way to build your personalized toolkit is to create learning strategy cards:

1. On index cards or in a digital note, create entries for different learning challenges you commonly face (e.g., “Memorizing terminology,” “Understanding complex processes,” “Solving problems”)
2. For each challenge, list:
• Your go-to strategies that leverage your cognitive strengths
• Complementary approaches that ensure well-rounded learning
• Specific techniques that have worked well for you in the past
3. Review and update these cards based on your experiences, adding new strategies as you discover them.

This creates a growing, personalized reference that you can turn to when approaching new learning tasks.

Practical Exercise: Cognitive Flexibility Training

Let’s put these ideas into practice with an exercise designed to build your cognitive versatility:

Multi-Modal Learning Challenge

1. Select a concept: Choose something you’re currently learning or a new concept you’re interested in.
2. Learn it verbally: Explain the concept in words, either by writing a paragraph or recording yourself explaining it.
3. Represent it visually: Create a diagram, mind map, or sketch that represents the same concept.
4. Teach it sequentially: Break the concept down into a step-by-step explanation with clear logical progression.
5. Describe it globally: Explain how this concept connects to broader principles or other knowledge you already have.
6. Reflect on the process: Which approaches felt most natural? Which provided new insights? How might you combine these approaches in future learning?

This exercise builds your ability to translate information between different cognitive modes, strengthening your overall learning flexibility.

Addressing Common Challenges

Let’s address some common challenges related to cognitive preferences:

“I’ve always been told I have a specific learning style.”

Response: While you may indeed have preferences, research doesn’t support the idea that you can only learn effectively through one modality. Instead of limiting yourself, use your preferences as strengths while developing versatility in other approaches.

“I struggle with how information is presented in my courses.”

Response: Rather than waiting for information to be presented in your preferred way, develop the ability to translate it yourself. If a lecture doesn’t include visuals, create your own diagrams. If a text is too abstract, generate your own concrete examples.

“Different subjects seem to require completely different approaches.”

Response: This is actually a feature, not a bug! Developing a range of learning strategies allows you to match your approach to the subject matter. The goal isn’t to find one universal method but to build a versatile toolkit.

“I’m not sure if my learning difficulties are due to cognitive preferences or other factors.”

Response: Learning challenges can stem from many sources—attention issues, knowledge gaps, motivation, or specific learning disabilities. If you consistently struggle despite trying various approaches, consider seeking professional assessment.

Conclusion

Understanding your cognitive preferences isn’t about labeling yourself or limiting your approach to learning. Instead, it’s about developing self-awareness that allows you to strategically leverage your natural tendencies while building versatility.

The most effective learners aren’t those who rigidly adhere to a single style but those who can adapt their approach based on both their own cognitive profile and the demands of what they’re learning. By developing this flexibility, you’ll be equipped to learn effectively in any context, regardless of how information is presented.

In our next lesson, we’ll explore effective note-taking strategies—methods for capturing and organizing information in ways that enhance understanding and retention rather than just passively recording content.

Visual Element Suggestion: An infographic titled “Cognitive Preferences Spectrum” showing the different dimensions discussed in the lesson (verbal-visual, sequential-global, focused-diffuse, etc.) as continua rather than binary categories. This would help learners visualize these preferences as flexible tendencies rather than fixed types and identify where their own preferences might fall along each spectrum.